Min menu

Pages

Can "Kamikaze" pilot Nancy Pelosi spark the Sino-American war?

I have some naive questions regarding the Sino-American conflict that is approaching because of the visit of the Speaker of the United States Congress' House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, to Taiwan.   But first, let's start with the backdrop.



 


I have some naive questions regarding the Sino-American conflict that is approaching because of the visit of the Speaker of the United States Congress' House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, to Taiwan.


But first, let's start with the backdrop.


  • In November, both the United States and China are holding fateful elections for the US Democratic Party and Xi Jinping.
  • Those who acquiesce in this confrontation, which has already begun, face a verdict of loss at home and even final loss.
  • Any waiver and loss of face here is unacceptable to both parties.


The economic situation in both the United States and China is on the verge of collapse. Inflation was rising in the United States, and the attempt to combat it had already caused an economic recession there. The rejection of this fight is likely to lead to excessive inflation in the United States next year, or at least a year later, in conjunction with the United States presidential election year. In China, the real estate crisis began, and the first protests have already erupted.


If economic collapse is inevitable, then there is no point clinging to old business relations, and one must not look for a way out, but a scapegoat, fit to blame for staying in power. Attempts to blame Putin for Putin's "gas station tax" and "Putin's inflation" are no longer too convincing, and war with China can explain difficulties on any scale.


In order to achieve domestic political goals, the United States elite has proved ready not only to burn down the rest of the world


  1. but also to burn down the United States itself. After "Rasha Gate", Democratic-led riots since 
  2. Black Lives Matter", and Biden's inauguration under the protection of the military
  3. I am ready to receive any degree of imbalance and disadvantage
  4.  from the US administration.


There is nothing the American elite is no longer willing to do in the power struggle, especially in such a secondary arena: the foreign arena.


On the Chinese side, control of Taiwan not only contributes to uniting the Chinese nation around Xi Jinping, who will then be automatically re-elected for a new term, but is also a necessary step towards defeating the United States of America and taking China's global leadership position.


We come to ask questions:


Has the conflict been exacerbated by deliberate action by the United States of America?


As I mentioned above, the visit and the promise of a strong US reaction against China's harsh reaction could aim to dislodge Xi Jinping in the upcoming CPC leadership elections in November. The Chinese elite is divided, and the pro-United States forces in China's interior are strong, all they need is little help in weighing balance in the right direction, a perfectly realistic option.


But, with the seriousness of all the above arguments, I do not rule out that Putin (as we recently used to) is responsible for everything.. But here I am not kidding, but Putin's extraordinary ability to exercise restraint could have led the United States of America to get used to the idea that its provocations could remain unanswered. Putin has his own tactics, which are successful, despite the need to recognize that long periods of stillness without an immediate response to provocations, encourage Washington to move beyond.


Thus, the American elite easily falls into radicalism because of its impunity, and does not tend to think carefully about the consequences of its actions.


  • How many Western leaders have visited Kiev in recent months? How many weapons have been handed over to Ukraine?
  • What sense can such a visit to Taiwan and some press statements and statements here and there carry against this background?


I therefore do not exclude the option that it was the United States of America that triggered the stupid escalation as a side effect of internal confusion and irresponsibility.


Is the Biden administration aware of the inevitability of a severe economic crisis this fall and Democrats' loss of power?


The truth is, I'm not so sure.


  • However, the impending collapse makes the trigger of the conflict with China a very reasonable and practical course of action.
  • In the event of war, elections could be cancelled.
  • In addition, the loss of the world's leadership by the United States of America
  • and the consequent severe economic and political crisis


is a potential that can only be avoided by China's destruction, or one hundred years back. Trump realized and sought it, and Democrats opposed it.